Parades Commission: controversy

Sir George Quigley’s proposal to split the Parades Commission into two bodies to deal separately with adjudication and mediation is meeting with some opposition, primarily from nationalists who feel that the current body is working perfectly well. As Alex Attwood said before the publication of the proposals on Thursday, “Our position is that ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’.”

Unionists have not been happy with the working of the current body, the second such set up to deal with contentious parades in Northern Ireland. Early indications are that they are happy with the proposed move. A changed dynamic holds out the promise of a reversal of previous outcomes, such as the banning of the controversial Garvaghy Road parade.

Quigley was prompted on Friday to qualify them in the Belfast Telegraph.

Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.