Recovery of assets key to community stability?

The Northern Ireland Office today published the Research and Statistical Bulletin (PDF) 1/2006 ‘Public Attitudes Towards Crime and Recovery of Assets by the Assets Recovery Agency (ARA) in Northern Ireland: Findings from the July 2005 Northern Ireland Omnibus Survey’. The following based on an analysis of 14 questions that were included in the July 2005 Northern Ireland Omnibus Survey, a personal interview survey of 1,148 adults living in private households throughout Northern Ireland. 60% of respondents thought recovery of significant sums of money would improve things for their community:


* Four fifths (80%) of those surveyed had heard/read something about ARA.
* Of those who had heard/read something about ARA, television was the main method of communication (80%).
* Approximately two thirds (64%) of those surveyed believe that ARA has acted in a way which is fair to all sections of the community.
* Nearly nine tenths (87%) of those surveyed agreed that ‘many people in Northern Ireland these days who are living of the proceeds of crime’.
* Over one fifth (21%) of those surveyed suspected that someone in their own neighbourhood had obtained a large part of their wealth from crime, while over two fifths (41%) of people believed that there were people living in their local community who had acquired a significant part of their wealth from crime.
* Almost nine tenths (89%) of respondents would react with some anger and concern if someone whose wealth had come largely from the proceeds of crime, moved into their immediate neighbourhood.
* More that four fifths (86%) of those surveyed agreed that ‘many criminals who go to jail manage to hang on to the proceeds of crime and are able to live a wealthy lifestyle when their prison sentence is over’.
* More than four fifths (83%) of those surveyed said that wealth confiscation and a prison sentence are equally important objectives in dealing with criminals.
* Almost three quarters (72%) of those surveyed thought that drug dealing financed serious or organised crime.
* The majority (91%) of respondents supported ARA’s power to act through civil courts to recover assets resulting from crime even if the person has not been convicted in the criminal courts. Over one third (36%) expressed concern that these powers could be abused.
* Over one quarter (26%) of respondents were concerned that people they knew could be unfairly targeted by ARA because of its powers.
* Six tenths of those surveyed (60%) thought that the recovery of significant sums of money would have a positive effect on their community.

Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

Categories Uncategorised Tags

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.