O’Loan calls Stormont House Agreement ” an insult” as Labour promises a Pat Finucane inquiry

Amnesty International are not alone in finding the resources allocated in the Stormont house Agreement inadequate for dealing with the past. At a meeting of RightsWatch  in Westminster last night,  the first Police Ombudsman  Baroness Nuala O’Loan  was scathing, describing the allocation of £150 million over 5 years to deal with all the issues of the past, as “a joke and an insult to the people of Northern Ireland.” The Historical Investigations Unit was “totally inadequate”.  She also said Attorney General  John Larkin  had got it “ profoundly wrong” to believe that  little evidence  remained and that  police investigations should cease in favour of a de facto amnesty. “I believe that many cases would have been solved if the will had been there.”

She took the broad view of collusion, meaning not only direct involvement but turning a blind eye, encouraging illegal acts and conducting sham investigations.  The argument was: “We needed to infiltrate organisations to get informants and then protect the informants.  Informants who confessed were not prosecuted. Suspects had one long sham interview and then released.  Interviewers did not complete records.  Collusion between paramilitaries and the State operated through all paramilitary organisations.”

I asked the Sinn Fein MP Pat Doherty if it would help if former IRA members came forward to give evidence of collusion. He welcomed the idea if appropriate arrangements could be made for the security forces to come forward.  Lady O’Loan retorted  that it was safe to say that knowing it wouldn’t happen” Mr Doherty replied : “If the former IRA were given immunity they would not be found wanting”.  And so we go round in circles.

The meeting was called to review latest moves in the long campaign for a public inquiry into the murder of solicitor Pat Finucane in 1989. It was attended  by his widow  Geraldine  and son John who was 8 years old when his father was murdered.   MI5 are believed to be a major obstacle to holding a public inquiry.  Mark Durkan MP told how when he asked Tony Blair at Weston Park why the delay in holding a PI the PM grimaced and rolled his eyes –  twice.  Jane Winter the former director of Rights Watch attended the  Downing St  meeting with Mrs Finucane  when  David Cameron told them he was  setting up the de Silva  review not a PI. She repeated the account she gave to the Detail   When challenged Mr Cameron  said, “ Look, the last administration couldn’t deliver an inquiry in your husband’s case  and neither can we. Because there are people all around this place, [10 Downing Street], who won’t let it happen.” Ms Winter said that as the Prime Minister made the admission he raised a finger and made a circular motion in the air”

A judicial review of the decision not to hold a PI is due in May.

Rights Watch said that earlier in the day the Labour shadow secretary of state Ivan Lewis  had given “ a cast iron guarantee”  that Labour in government would set up a PI. This was greeted with some scepticism by the SDLP MPs and the Sinn Fein MP present. Baroness Helena Kennedy ( a Labour peer) said Labour  was often beguiled by the secret world and authoritarian when in government.  Lawyers present said that a PI into Finucane wouldn’t be anything like as lengthy of the Bloody Sunday inquiry. The issues had been scoped by de Silva and an inquiry would not run on endlessly.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.