Expert forum to advise on the misuse of Dáil privilege…

This was launched whilst I was away, but it’s long overdue. I’m pretty certain Dail privilege is cast iron guaranteed via Article 15.10 of the Irish Constitution, but that guarantee has been used to launch attacks on individuals outside parliament.

So Ceann Comhairle Sean O’Fearghaíl (the Dail’s first freely elected ‘speaker’) has announced the establishment of an expert forum on Dáil privilege.

According to the terms of reference, there are two key issues at play (PDF):

…make recommendations on how to strike a fair balance in relation to:

(i) freedom of debate and protection of the citizen’s constitutional rights to his or her good name
and to privacy; and
(ii) freedom of debate and the rights of the individual in the context of court proceedings.

It’s specific about what’s under consideration, re the administration of Dail standing orders (PDF):

– the operation of Dáil Standing Order 59 (‘the sub judice rule’)
– the operation of Dáil Standing Order 61 (‘Defamatory Utterances’);
– similar issues of privilege arising under Articles 15.12 and 15.13 of the Constitution;
– avenues of redress for persons who have been found to have been adversely affected by
statements made under privilege;
– the sanctions which the Dáil may impose for abuse of privilege;

The forum consists of former government chief whip Mary Hanafin, former editor of Irish Times Conor Brady, senior counsel Conleth Bradley and UCD’s widely respected Professor David Farrell will act as chair.

They’ve made a call for submissions from the public on the matter…

The Forum now wishes to hear from interested members of the public and is seeking written submissions addressing the following 6 questions as applicable in Dáil Éireann:-

1. What constitutes a responsible use of freedom of debate in the Houses of the Oireachtas?

2. How should freedom of debate in the Houses of the Oireachtas and the right of an individual to his or her good name be balanced against each other?

3. How should freedom of debate in the Houses of the Oireachtas and the rights of the individual in court proceedings be balanced against each other?

4. If a person’s good name has been impugned in the Houses of the Oireachtas, or his or her privacy has been breached, what procedure should be in place (within the Oireachtas itself) to deal with the abuse of privilege?

5. What recourse should the citizen have where his or her good name or privacy rights have been interfered with by the abuse of privilege? What measures to protect the good name of the citizen should be considered?

6. What sanctions should be imposed on a Member who has abused privilege?

Submissions should be sent by email to (email attachments will not be accepted), or by post to the Journal Office, Houses of the Oireachtas Service, Leinster House, Dublin 2, D02 XR20.

The deadline for receipt of written submissions is 11 September 2017 at 6pm.

The forum will start detailed work in September, with their first report expected to be by taken the Ceann Comhairle by the end of November.

Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.