Reports estimate Irish Reunification to cost somewhere between 37 pence and 44 trillion pounds…

Another day, another report on the potential cost of Irish Reunification. This time, it comes from the Institute of International and European Affairs (IIEA), a Dublin think tank. From John Campbell at the BBC:

The initial cost of a united Ireland would be at least €8bn (£6.86bn) a year rising to potentially €20bn (£17.15bn) a year, a new study has estimated.

The analysis has been published by the Institute of International and European Affairs (IIEA), a Dublin think tank.

It focuses on the subvention – the shortfall between what is raised in taxes in Northern Ireland and the amount spent on public services.

One author says the cost would cause residents’ living standards to fall.

One of the two authors, Prof John Fitzgerald, said that the initial cost of absorbing Northern Ireland would “put huge financial pressure” on the people of the state “resulting in an immediate, major reduction in their living standards”.

Along with his co-author, Prof Edgar Morgenroth, he argued that the cost of unification could be substantially reduced if Northern Ireland made major changes in its economy in order to raise its productivity.

Prof Morgenroth said some of the costs would also eventually be offset by the benefits of integration into the wider EU economy but this would take “some considerable time”.

They look at the subvention for 2019 as the more recent data, for 2020 and 2021, is distorted by pandemic-related spending in Northern Ireland.

They adjust the 2019 figures to reflect some of the differences a united Ireland would make, for example less spending on defence, more on contributions to the EU and increased corporation tax revenues.

That produces a subvention estimate of just under €11bn (£9.4bn) meaning the Irish state would need to find that money to provide public services to the state’s new population in what had been Northern Ireland.

The authors estimate that if social security benefits and public sector wages in Northern Ireland were immediately raised to match levels in Ireland the subvention would jump to more than €20bn, equivalent to 10% of national income.

The authors said this is “a huge sum” as total government expenditure in Ireland currently amounts to about 40% of national income.

“To deal with the resulting deficit, which under the most favourable circumstances would persist for many years after unification, there would have to be a dramatic increase in taxation and/or a major reduction in expenditure,” they add.

The authors consider two additional scenarios which assume that the UK would either write off Northern Ireland’s share of the UK’s national debt or continue to pay UK state pensions to people who had made national insurance contributions.

In those scenarios, the initial cost falls to between €8bn-9bn per year, although those estimates do not include the uprating of benefits and pay.

None of the estimates consider the potential savings from reducing public sector employment in NI or the longer term impacts if Northern Ireland’s economic performance was to converge on Ireland’s.

Unionists will leap upon this report to show that Ireland can’t afford reunification. However, Nationalists will counter with the 2021 paper by the political scientist Prof John Doyle. Again from John Campbell’s article:

 that the subvention is much smaller and would represent a deficit of less than €3bn (£2.57bn) for a unified state.

He said that was “within a range that a future state could cope with on a transitional basis”.

One of his major assumptions was that it would be “impossible that the level of subvention impacting a united Ireland would include both pensions and debt”.He has recently added to that analysis, emphasising the potentially positive longer run economic impacts of unification.

He concluded: “It is hard to think of compelling arguments as to why the same policy mix in the two parts of the island, post-unity, would see Northern Ireland’s economy continue to perform poorly by comparison with the south.”

So we end up with report tennis, where each side quotes from the report that best matches their narrative.

I studied economics as part of my degree at Queens, and you soon learn that reports that initially sound very fact-based are often guesstimates that end up with very different costs in the real world. Economics has the veneer of being very scientific and numbers-based, but it is not. There are too many variables at play, not to mention human nature is very unpredictable. There is interesting research on how winning the World Cup dramatically boosts the GDP of countries.

Also, is anyone else getting p*ssed off with this constant narrative that we are an economic basket case? I have been self employed my whole life and started a whole range of companies. I have clients who are successfully exporting all over the world. I take great offence to people telling us we are a bunch of incompetent freeloaders who can only survive on handouts.

The truth is, yes, we have challenges in Northern Ireland, but by and large, we are culturally and economically very similar North and South. Yes, the South has more foreign investment, but Northern Ireland is also basically at full employment.

Yes, there will be a period after reunification when there is a mismatch in spending, salaries, benefits, etc., but it will all settle down. The world will keep turning, and the sun will rise and set. We shall all get on with our lives as before and wonder what all the fuss was about.

While I am personally sceptical of many of these reports, Slugger is  very pro expert and has good relations with local universities. We are more than happy to run posts from any academics who want to highlight their work or give their views. 


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.